Home | Site Map | E-Mail  
  Tax Help | IRS Offer in Compromise Tax Help | IRS Offer in Compromise
   Toll Free
877-426-3121

Providing Tax Help To Taxpayers Nationwide

130 S. Bemiston, Suite 708
St. Louis, Missouri 63105

Free Consultation

Name:

Phone:

E-mail:

Type of Tax Problem:

IRS

State

Tax Amount Due:

Helpful Links

Helpful Links

IRS Tax Forms & Publications

Helpful Links

State Tax Forms

Helpful Links

Better Business Bureau

Google
  

Forbes - OutFront
Phony Tax
by Janet Novack , 11.14.05

Courts say a 3% toll tax is being wrongly collected. The IRS says, sue us.

Since early 2004 seven federal district court judges and one appeals panel have ruled that the Internal Revenue Service has wrongly collected a 3% federal tax on "toll telephone service," and awarded large refunds. So has the IRS backed off? Don't be silly. The IRS says, in effect, if you don't like it, sue us.

This is a tax that refuses to die. It was first passed in 1898 as a luxury tax to fund the Spanish-American War. Antitax pols consider it an anachronism, and in 2000 Congress passed a bill to kill it and the $6.5 billion a year it now raises. But President Clinton vetoed the bill.

Now, fed-up companies are suing--and winning 100% refunds. In October a district judge awarded Hewlett-Packard a $6.2 million refund, plus interest. Earlier, Honeywell, AOL, OfficeMax, Fortis, Reese Brothers and Amtrak won smaller amounts. More big companies--including Wal-Mart, Home Depot, JPMorgan Chase, PNC Bank, MBNA, United Technologies and Eaton--have filed suit.

Over the past decade dozens of other big companies have quietly applied to the IRS and got about 35% of their tax back, reports lawyer Jacob Miles of Kelley Drye & Warren. No matter, the IRS still insists that telecom providers collect the tax, and it is appealing, or is expected to appeal, all seven district court losses.

The government's main argument goes like this: "Toll telephone service" is defined in the law as service billed by distance and time. That seems to exempt long-distance service that is charged at a flat rate per minute, as most is these days. But the IRS says the "and" in the 1965 rewrite of the statute can be read as an "or," which renders the law ambiguous, thus requiring a judge to discern Congress' intent, which was to tax long-distance calls.

As for consumers and small businesses, good luck. "Obviously, mom and pop with their $17 claim aren't going to go through litigation," says Stephen Rosen of Levine, Blaszak, Block & Boothby, which has brought multiple telecom tax refund suits. And class actions against the IRS aren't allowed under federal law.

Home

 
   
   

A MSI, Inc. Company